ADVERTISING

Latest Photo Galleries

Signs of Tension Signs of Tension

Published on 04/11/2016

Rio: a City in Metamorphosis Rio: a City in Metamorphosis

Published on 11/19/2015

Brazilian Markets

17h36

Bovespa

-0,07% 124.646

16h43

Gold

0,00% 117

17h00

Dollar

+0,29% 5,1640

16h30

Euro

+0,49% 2,65250

ADVERTISING

"Purpose of Commission is not to Punish", Says Former Minister of Justice

05/23/2013 - 08h18

Advertising

MATHEUS LEITÃO
JOÃO CARLOS MAGALHÃES
FROM BRASILIA

Investigations of the National Truth Commission should not seek punishment of persons related to deaths, torture and disappearances during the military dictatorship (1964-1985).

This is the opinion of former Justice Minister José Carlos Dias, a member of the board. "The purpose of the commission is not punitive," he said.

The punishment for crimes committed during the period will be a topic discussed by the commission at public hearings starting the middle of next year, about six months before the release of its final report. The purpose of the discussions will help define which recommendations the commission will adopt.

"We cannot do investigations aiming at criminal accountability. Eventually, the facts investigated by the commission may be the object of state action. But it is not up to the commission to make that kind of recommendation," said Dias.

Karime Xavier/Folhapress
José Carlos Dias (left), from Truth Comission
José Carlos Dias (left), from Truth Comission

It is not yet clear what the weight will be of the opinion of people outside of the commission, exposed in the hearings, will have on the definition of the suggestions made by the board - autonomous to prepare its report. The committee's conclusions will not be required to be carried out.

Today, the Amnesty Act prevents the accountability of public officials involved in the killings, torture and disappearances by the dictatorship. The same applies to crimes committed by those who resisted the regime.

CONTROVERSY

A central controversy in the creation of the commission in May of last year, the need to change the law is not a consensus among the seven members of the board.

Two days ago, during an event to disclose the results of a year of the commission's work, Rosa Cardoso, the current coordinator of the board, and Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro, who also held the position, said to be favorable to punishment, as, for example, decided in the 2010 sentence by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of the Araguaia Guerrilla.

Claudio Fonteles, another of the members, told Folha he would be in favor of changing the law. "If such conduct [violations], by constitutional provision, are indefeasible, obviously they can never be forgotten. And if they cannot be forgotten, there is no sense in talking of amnesty."

Contacted by Folha, the other three members of the group (José Paulo Cavalcanti, Gilson Dipp and Maria Rita Kehl) did not respond by the completion of this edition.

Translated by DAVE WOLIN

Read the article in the original language

You have been successfully subscribed. Thanks!

Close

Are you interested in news from Brazil?

Subscribe to our English language newsletter, delivered to your inbox every working day, and keep up-to-date with the most important news from Brazil.

Cancel